Robert A. J. Gagnon
4天 ·
Why I Do Not Celebrate “LGBTQ+ Pride Month" But Mourn It
by Robert A. J. Gagnon, Ph.D.
google translate:
羅伯特·A·J·加格農
4天·
為什麼我不慶祝“LGBTQ+驕傲月”而是哀悼它
作者：羅伯特·A·J·加格農 (Robert A. J. Gagnon) 博士
不僅驕傲通常是一種罪過，而且在所謂的「LGBTQ+驕傲月」中也沒有什麼值得驕傲的。讓我們愛那些有同性吸引力和性別認同不安的人，拒絕他們存在中羞辱上帝按照祂的形象創造的人的這一方面。
我們也應該對他們與罪惡慾望的鬥爭表示同情，並讚揚上帝透過抑制這些慾望來加深與自己和他人的關係。然而，任何人都不應該為這種慾望或滿足這些慾望而產生的行為感到自豪。
- 有什麼值得驕傲的？
為什麼一個人應該為被自己性別的獨特性所激發而感到自豪，這要么是自戀，要么是自欺欺人（即未能理解一個人已經完全是自己的性別）？
人們是否也應該為被近親（亂倫，即對親屬關係的吸引，類似於對同性的吸引）或同時被多個人（耶穌基於上帝有意創造一個人的邏輯而拒絕）性喚起感到自豪？ ）？
為什麼一個人應該以拒絕接受上帝設計的身體訊息、認同與自己的生物性別不一致的「性別」為榮呢？抱怨造物主並沒有什麼值得驕傲的，反而是偶像崇拜的表現。 - 社會危害與對聖經的譴責
「酷兒」生活方式的特徵是性傳染病的發生率極高、性伴侶數量較多（尤其是男性同性戀者）、關係更替率較高、心理健康問題增加（尤其是女性同性戀者）。
這些風險與已知的男女差異有關；當親密關係缺乏真正的性伴侶或互補時，就會出現預期的結果。同性結合並不能緩和特定性別的極端行為；他們加大力度；不是填補空白，而是擴大缺口。
聖經（包括耶穌和他的使徒見證）將同性戀行為和變性視為令人憎惡的性不道德行為（「可憎之事」），可能使不悔改的罪犯被排除在上帝的國度之外。這種行為侵犯了耶穌自己、他的聖經和他的使徒所定義的性道德基礎。
3.「LGBTQ+」政治的危險
「LGBTQ+」政治議程是當今政治中最不自由、最仇恨的議程。它的特點是努力壓制言論自由和宗教自由。這是當今西方世界對這些自由的最大威脅，而且幾十年來一直如此。
沒有任何政治遊說團體比這更專注於取消和審查他人、向學童灌輸思想，甚至強制發表言論（極權主義的標誌）。
不同意「LGBTQ+」教條的人們的工作正面臨風險：教師、醫生、護士、心理學家、花店、攝影師、小企業主、律師、企業高管等。
兒童被引導接受化學閹割和殘害手術，這是國家推動的虐待兒童的明顯例子。事實上，國家現在正朝著將未能確認孩子「LGBTQ+」身分的父母視為虐待兒童的方向發展（我們知道真正的虐待兒童者是誰），要求國家幹預將自己的孩子從你身邊帶走。
冒充女性的男性正在侵入女性廁所、更衣室、運動場所、避難所和監獄，甚至獲得厭惡女性的獎項來慶祝，宣稱他們是比真正的女性更好的女性。
忠實基督教教育的理念正面臨風險，人們呼籲將聯邦學生貸款、助學金和認證與「LGBTQ+」意識形態掛鉤。
4.道德敗壞與真愛
一場運動教導說，男人也可以有月經和生育，科學正在遭受苦難。諾斯底教派的精神遍布這片土地，宣稱他們被困在並非旨在表達不道德性慾的身體中。
這不是一個值得「驕傲」的月份，而是一個值得哀悼的月份。哀悼我們國家普遍存在的道德敗壞。它不僅傷害了整個國家，而且特別傷害了那些自欺欺人地慶祝對自己以及與他人和上帝的關係有害的事物的人。
正如保羅告訴哥林多人的那樣，他們不應該因為自己能夠容忍惡劣的性不道德行為（有成年人同意的亂倫）而「驕傲自滿」或「驕傲自滿」。支持「酷兒」生活是功能性仇恨的表現，而不是愛。
因此，我選擇去愛，真正去愛那些自認為是「男同性戀」、「女同性戀」、「雙性戀」和「跨性別者」的人，為真相而不是謊言而欣喜，無論為此付出什麼代價。
https://www.facebook.com/robert.a.gagnon.56
Not only is pride generally a sin, but also there is nothing to be proud of in the so-called “LGBTQ+ Pride Month." Let us love persons with same-sex attractions and gender-identity dysphoria by rejecting that facet of their existence that dishonors the persons whom God has created in his image.
We should also show sympathy for their struggle with sinful desires, and applaud the way God can use the mortification of such desires to deepen a relationship with himself and others. Yet no one should take pride in such desires or the behavior that follows from gratifying them.
- What is there to be proud of?
Why should one take pride in being erotically aroused by the distinctives of one’s own sex, which is either narcissism or self-deception (viz., the failure to apprehend that one is already fully one’s own sex)?
Should people also take pride in being erotically aroused by close kin (incest, i.e., attraction to a kinship same, akin to attraction to a sexual same) or by multiple persons concurrently (which Jesus rejected based on the logic of God’s intentional creation of a sexual binary)?
Why should one take pride in rejecting the messaging of one’s body as designed by God by identifying with a “gender" at odds with one’s biological sex? A complaint against one’s Creator is nothing to be proud of, but rather an expression of idolatry. - Social harm and the condemnation of Scripture
The “queer" lifestyle is one marked by disproportionately high rates for sexually transmitted disease and higher numbers of sex partners (especially for homosexual males), as well as higher relational turnover and increased mental health problems (especially for homosexual females).
These risks correlate with known male-female differences; expected results when an intimate relationship lacks true sexual counterparts or complements. Same-sex unions don’t moderate the extremes of a given sex; they ratchet them up; don’t fill in the gaps, but widen the breach.
Scripture (including Jesus and the apostolic witness to him) views homosexual practice and transgenderism as abhorrent sexual immorality (“abominations") that can get unrepentant offenders excluded from God’s kingdom. Such behaviors assault the foundation of sexual ethics as defined by Jesus himself, his Scripture, and his apostles. - The dangers of “LGBTQ+” politics
The “LGBTQ+" political agenda is the most illiberal and hateful agenda in politics today. It is characterized by efforts to stifle free speech and the free exercise of religion. It is the greatest threat to these freedoms in the Western world today, and has been for decades.
No political lobby has concentrated more on canceling and censoring others, indoctrinating school children, and even mandating compelled speech (the hallmark of totalitarians).
People’s jobs are being put at risk who dissent from “LGBTQ+" dogma: teachers, doctors, nurses, psychologists, florists, photographers, small business owners, lawyers, corporate executives, etc.
Children are being directed toward chemical castration and mutilation surgery, an obvious instance of child abuse being pushed by the state. Indeed, the state is now moving in the direction of regarding parents who fail to affirm their child’s “LGBTQ+" identity as perpetrating child abuse (we know who the real child abusers are), requiring the state’s intervention to take your own child away from you.
Men identifying falsely as women are invading women’s restrooms, locker rooms, sports, shelters, and prisons, even being celebrated with misogynistic awards declaring them to be better women than real women.
The very idea of faithful Christian education is being put at risk, with calls for tying federal student loans, grants, and accreditation toward lock-step compliance with “LGBTQ+" ideology. - Moral rot and true love
Science is suffering at the hands of a movement that teaches that men too can have periods and give birth. A gnostic spirit pervades the land, declaring entrapment in bodies not designed to express their sexually immoral desires.
This is not a month to be “proud" but rather a month to mourn. Mourn the moral rot pervading our country. It has harmed not only the nation as a whole, but especially those who in their self-delusion celebrate what is injurious to themselves, and to their relationship with others and God.
As Paul told the Corinthians, they should not be “puffed up" or “inflated with pride" over their ability to tolerate an egregious act of sexual immorality (there a case of adult-consensual incest). To support the “queer" life is a manifestation of functional hate, not love.
Therefore, I choose rather to love, to love truly, those who identify as “gay," “lesbian," “bisexual," and “transgender," rejoicing in the truth rather than in the lie, whatever the cost for doing so.
Facts4LGBT 同性戀及跨性別資料庫 